Completed By: Claire Mesesan – VP, Farmer Relations & Raya Carr – Senior Relationship Manager

Organization and its farmland

  • How much farmland does your organization own and manage? (total acres):

30,108 total (owned: / financed through mortgages: ) Note that Iroquois Valley does not manage farmland – we work with independent farmers who manage their own operations. Our only management requirement is that farmland be certified organic

  • Where is this farmland located? (Counties, State): 44 unique counties in 17 states
  • Will you be acquiring more farmland over time? (Y/N/Maybe) Yes
  • How much of your current farmland do you expect to still be in farmland in 10 years? (Please provide estimate by percentage or acreage, whichever is easier) 

100%

  • What percentage or number of acres of your farm properties have farm infrastructure (fencing, well water, farm buildings – not including tiling)? Please share any helpful comments or explanations. 

A small percentage of acres comprising our farm properties have infrastructure. We don’t have this data point, but as a guestimate 5% > .

  • In general, is your organization interested and willing to invest in more infrastructure (fences, wells, farm buildings, etc.) on the farmland it owns? (Y/N/Maybe – we welcome some comments as well if the situation is nuanced) 

It depends. For purchases, we are willing to make capital investments subject to approval. Typical projects may be fencing, grain bins, improvements to existing structures. For properties that already have or that need significant capital investment, we prefer to provide financing for the land and for the farmer(s) to take on financing infrastructure with another lender or through their own means. This is because we are not an active property manager and we do not want to take on responsibility for essential infrastructure as an owner; therefore, our preference is for the farmer to be the owner.

  • What kind of farming is currently being done on your land? Please list the number of fields or acres for each.
      • Conventional commodity row crops (corn & soy): 0
      • Conventional livestock production: 0
      • Organic/sustainable grains: 12,941 acres – farmed organically with a mix of transitional and certified production. We categorize this as crop rotation, which typically means corn, beans, wheat, and/or hay.
      • Organic/sustainable/rotational livestock production: Dairy (cow and 1 goat dairy operation) accounts for 1,685 acres / Livestock accounts for 10,846 acres. 
      • Local vegetable production:
      • Hay: Unknown, hay is grown at most if not all pastured dairy & livestock operations and is also grown on crop rotation farms. 
      • Trees/Agroforestry: Unknown, but approximately 12 farms in the portfolio are known to use agroforestry practices. Woodlands are also present on a number of crop farms, but we have not pulled that specific data yet.
      • Other: Diversified is a category we use to capture multiple (more than 2) entreprises on an operation. There are 4,626 acres in diversified production.
  • Does your organization offer (or partner to offer) any education about farming to the public or to the farmers who farm your organization’s land? (Y/N – if Yes, please briefly describe)

Not typically; our focus is land security through financial services. In the past, we have sponsored farmer attendance at regional organic farming conferences. Farmers must have 3-5 years of experience in order to work with us. Their commitment to ongoing learning and education (farming, financial, business management, etc) are all positive factors in our investment-making process.

  • How is revenue from your organization’s farmland used by your organization?

Revenue generated from farmer payments pay the vast majority of all expenses from staffing to investor payments (dividends and interest payments). The only other income Iroquois Valley receives is from grants, which accounts for 4% of Iroquois Valley’s income. 

Farmland management decision-making, staffing, and policies

  • Who leads the management and operation of your farmland on a day-to-day basis?

The farmers we work with are in charge of their own operations and the management of farmland.

  •  
  • How many staff total (full-time equivalents) manage your farmland on a day-to-day basis over a year? 

0

  • What policies, if any, drive or guide your land management decisions?   

We are committed to organic farmland management as a baseline. Farmers are welcome and encouraged to go above and beyond organic in practices and additional certifications as relevant.

  • Is fostering local food production on your farmland important to your organization? (Y/N – if Yes, please briefly explain how this is pursued or may be pursued in the future)

Yes. We are interested in supporting farmers at all levels of the food system, which includes those selling to local markets.

Relationship with Farmers and Conservation

  • What kind of standard leasing and licensing arrangements do you have with your farmers? How long do your leases typically last and do they ever deviate from that period? How are farmers selected for farmland lease opportunities? How is lease pricing set for standard farmland lease arrangements?  

See crop rotation lease information and diversified lease information.

  • How many total lease or lease-to-own agreements does your organization have? 

59 lease agreements total. Although farmers become eligible to purchase leased land after 7 years, we do not have any lease-to-own agreements.

  • When a farmer’s lease ends, can it be renewed without going into a competitive process? (Y/N – explanation appreciated if you answered Yes)

Yes, leases are automatically renewed so long as farmers are in good standing. Keeping farmers on the land is one of our core guiding principles.

  • Do you restrict any practices farmers can do on your land for conservation purposes (no fall tillage, prohibition on the use of certain chemicals, no hay cutting until certain date, etc.)?  (Y/N – if Yes, please briefly describe)

Yes, once the farmer is under contract with us, land must be transitioned to and maintained under organic certification.

  • Do you require and/or incentivize any positive conservation measures to be taken by the farmers (use of cover crops, installation of prairie strips, etc)? (Y/N – if Yes, please briefly describe) 

Yes, we have an in-house grant program called the Soil Restoration Pool that funds farmer-proposed soil health & conservation projects from $500-$8,000. We also subsidize the organic transition period in our leases with lower rates.

  • Do you have any programs designed to help beginning farmers (farmers with less than 10 years of experience) get a start on your organization’s farmland? If so, please describe. 

Yes, about 64% of the farmers we work with are millennials or have millennials involved on the farm and 2% are Gen Z. We find that our leases are popular with young farmers who often do not have capital for a down payment because they are investing in establishing and growing their operations.

  • Does your organization allow for unique/custom farming arrangements on specific farmland properties to explore or test conservation approaches? (Y/N – if Yes, please describe) 

We are pretty agnostic to operation type so long as payments can be made and the land is certified organic. We underwrite based on business plan and financial documents against a specific property. This approach allows us to fund a wide range of farmers incorporating a variety of conservation practices within their operations.

  • Please describe any edge-of-field practices your organization carries out around tillable acreages or requires farmers to plant/maintain (e.g. buffers or bioreactors, etc.).  

Many farmers we work with use buffer strips, particularly as needed to satisfy organic standards when properties are adjacent to conventional fields. Beyond that, many farmers we work with plant pollinator and native habitat, preserve rangeland, plant windrows/windbreaks, and restore riparian zones to name a few of the common ones.

  • Do you have any organic farming leases/arrangements with farmers? (Y/N – if Yes, please describe briefly and share how many acres are in organic production) 

Yes. The numbers below represent estimates. Some of the acres listed as transitional were eligible for certification this year, but we don’t have updated records on the timing 

      • Certified organic: 0 acres
      • Uncertified but managed organically: 417 (these are exceptions for people who found organic certification cost prohibitive. 307 of those acres will be recertified in the next year. 
      • Transitional acres: Need to ask Arnie if 2019 crop properties would be certified now. 
  • Do you do any formal or informal activities to build good relationships with your farmer tenants/partners, like meeting in person on an annual basis? (Y/N – if Yes, please describe briefly) 

Yes. Annual financial & operational review with relationship manager and a farm visit (strive toward an annual basis, but may be less frequently for more remote farms and may be more frequently for other farms). Farmer newsletter and listserv to share relevant news from the company along with interesting opportunities (grants, news, etc), and to highlight farmers and their operations. 

Monitoring and Information systems

  • What systems does your organization use for holding and storing data about your farmland properties as well as for administering them (GIS, databases, etc.)?  

Recently invested and are in the process of implementing two software systems: Tillable and Abrigo, which should be fully in use in the new year. We use Box for sensitive information and records and a mix of Google Drive for more general information. Some use of Microsoft Excel.

  • What things do you monitor to determine whether your farmland management system has the conservation impacts you want to see?  

Generally, we find that the farmers we work with are very invested in their land. They have unique interests and motivations when it comes to impact measurement. We are supportive of farmers defining what that means to them and try to capture a baseline through an annual soil health survey. We don’t necessarily get full participation and it doesn’t necessarily capture everything, so this may not be entirely accurate or representative of the portfolio.

  • Soil testing? (Y/N – if yes, please provide a short description of what kind, how often, who pays for soil testing, whether same testing lab is used, etc.)

We track whether farmers are testing their soil, what metrics they’re looking for and have seen over time, and what kind of tests they use. If they do, we may ask for copies of the tests. 

  • Other soil health metrics (earthworms, etc.)? Y/N plus a short description. 

Unknown

  • Erosion monitoring? Y/N with a short description if Yes 

This is a part of our soil health survey.  We work with farmers who are enrolled in the Highly Erodible Land Conservation program through NRCS.

  • Water quality testing/monitoring? Y/N plus short description if Yes  

Unknown

  • Wildlife monitoring? Y/N plus short description if Yes  

One farm in the portfolio is certified through Xerces Society Bee Better program to support native pollinators and another is certified through Audubon’s Conservation Ranching program. We work with another farm that works with their Soil & Water Conservation District on a Grassland Bird Conservation program called Ag Allies. There are other anecdotal stories on wildlife that we are aware of, but these are the formal programs I know farmers in the network are engaged in.  

  • Is the farmer responsible for providing any of the above information?

Yes, primarily through a survey and conversations.

  • Do you have any indexes or other systems for quickly assessing the practices and ecological health of a particular piece of farmland?  

No

Bigger Picture Questions 

  • What are the three projects and/or aspects of your farmland management system you are most proud of in terms of your organization’s farmland management system over the past three years?

We are proud of the fact that we support independent farmers across the country to grow their organic, transitional, and regenerative farming operations through our diverse financial products.

  • What are three of your instiution’s biggest challenges around conservation-minded management of its farmland?

Many challenges come down to the financial pressure farmers face generally. Most farmers want to do more conservation practices than they have the resources to implement. 

  • What changes are you considering making to your farmland management system over the next five years? 

We are always working on developing our farmer-facing financial products to be more supportive! We are working on pooling more key resources to share with our farmer partners, as well. Another long-term goal is to build in additional, creative ways for farmers to build equity in our Company, and the properties they manage. 

Interviewed: March 3, 2023

Raya Carr, Senior Relationship Manager

 

Management Policy: Like other real estate investment trusts (REIT), Iroquois Valley REIT invests in real estate, but its specialty is purchasing organic farmland or land that will transition to organic. All of the farms that Iroquois Valley and its trust own across 19 states are organic or in transition to organic. “The REIT is a great way to structure the kind of land security regenerative and organic farmers need,” says Raya Carr. “Specifically, it makes for a widely held group of investors so the farmers know that there’s not one interest that’s getting too powerful. There’s not one investor that has more than five percent of the ownership. The mentality of buy and hold is unique among farmland companies.” There are many funds that guarantee five or 10 years and then sell the property.

Iroquois Valley started out with the idea of buying and holding farmland and supporting the farmers on the land as long as they needed. Iroquois Valley offers a leasing model under which farmers do have the option of buying the land at the seventh year, although the lease payments do not count against the purchase price. There’s also an evergreen lease which keeps renewing as long as the farmers wants to continue it (this is unlike some farmland investing companies which do not allow leasing to a farmer past 10 years). The default approach to setting the purchase price for the farmer to buy the farmland from Iroquois is to set it at the higher of the appraised value or the invested amount. But around 75% of Iroquois Valley leases with farmers are customized in some way. In some cases, for example, the farmer has the ability to buy some of the acres at a different point in the lease process. “We’re a small flexible company that is there for the unique needs of each farmer,” says Carr.  “And we want the farmer to own the land sometime in the next decade, and we’re going to work together with the farmer towards that goal.”

Iroquois Valley has also begun to offer farmland purchase financing to farmers through a mortgage program.

Farm Data Management: As per the survey, Iroquois Valley is using both Tillable and Abrago for tracking data about its farmland holdings but isn’t able to conclusively able to say which one they might use exclusively as they are both promising. Tillable has a lot of features that are available to anyone. Through them you can go and look up the property and pick some comparables. If you get a subscription with Tillable, you then receive a more full set of services, including the ability to keep records on your own portfolio and pool all of your data. Abrigo is more like a Constituent Relationship Management software. Iroquois Valley has entered the information about all of Iroquois Valley’s farmers in it and is using Abrigo as a portal for farmers to access information about their arrangements with Iroquois Valley. Iroquois Valley hopes it will eventually become through which farmers can upload information directly through it instead of going back and forth in emails.  Abrigo is currently being customized for Iroquois Valley’s unique needs.

Farmer Relationships and Conservation: All of Iroquois Valley farmers are required to be certified organic or transitioning to it. Iroquois Valley talks to their farmers at least once a year (this is usually when copies of the organic certification documents are provided to Iroquois Valley). Iroquois Valley also has a survey farmers can fill out which Iroquois Valley staff follow up on. In fact, Iroquois Valley strives to have its staff visit every farm once a year, with the worst case scenario being actual visits happening every other year. “I was really proud because last year I visited something like 25 farms,” says Carr. 

The visits also provide a more personal connection with the farmer, his/her family, and the land itself. “We talk about all the same things we could talk about on the phone,” says Carr, “but being in person just makes everything more genuine.” The farmers see that this relationship is important enough for Iroquois Valley to visit. At the same time, the visits also function as a site visit to check on the condition of the property and the farming and a chance to talk about problems, plans, and soil health. The organic certification by itself is not sufficient for Iroquois Valley. 

“I think the idea of farmers being all the same is dangerous,” says Carr. “You need to give room for uniqueness and to give space to hear out their perspectives about what’s going on in the property. Don’t read into communications or payments taking a while. Try to offer support in any way you can.” 

“And with volatile weather patterns, you can’t assume that every year is going to be the same,” says Carr, “so I really try to have proactive communication and open-mindedness for the twists and turns farmers are going to be dealing with.”

Close to 20 percent of the total number of farmers in land tenure arrangements through Iroquois Valley are beginning farmers. Yet, those beginning farmers make up only around 10 percent of Iroquois Valley investments. This is explained by the fact that farming is a capital-intensive business and beginning farmers are still getting established. Consequently, they are more limited in what they can safely borrow. 

About 10 percent of farms owned by Iroquois Valley farms have BIPOC farmers involved, and that is something that the company wants to maintain and grow. In fact, that will be the focus of a new relationship management position, and Iroquois Valley will be launching a new investment product specifically tailored for historically underserved farmers.”

Leasing Structure: Iroquois Valley has two different leasing systems. One is for farmers using grain rotations that are eligible for crop insurance. 

Leasing rates for grain rotation operations (for which Iroquois Valley has the longest experience) are generally composed of two set elements and one variable element. The set elements are the base rate plus the carrying costs of the property for Iroquois Valley. The base rent amount is a percentage of the acquisition price Iroquois Valley paid for the land. Once a property is certified organic, that percentage reaches its ceiling at 3.5 percent. The carrying cost portion is made up of property taxes and insurance. These are expenses that Iroquois Valley pays and then bills back to the farmer. Iroquois Valley could just structure the rent as just one price that all elements included without breaking them out for explanation. But Iroquois Valley values transparency in its relationship with farmers so all elements of lease rates are clearly explained and detailed on paper. In addition, if the farmer required some sort of very specific capital improvement (fencing, grain bin, etc.) to be made to the property that will generate a positive financial impact very quickly, Iroquois Valley will also consider making a capital loan to the farmer. The capital loan payments by the farmers are also added in a transparent fashion to annual lease payments to Iroquois Valley over the course of three to five years. The general guideline is that capital improvement should be no more than 10 percent of the land’s value. 

Farmers must make their lease payment early in the year for the base rent, carrying costs, and any capital improvements. 

Late in the year, the farmer usually must make an additional payment of the revenue share. This is calculated by subtracting the earlier payment made in the year from the gross revenue the farmer earned on the crop (s) grown that year and paying Iroquois Valley 33% of that amount. “I do think that the variable rent component is important to take the pressure off of farmers,” says Carr, “by sharing the risks and rewards with Iroquois Valley.”

The other leasing system is for “diversified farmers.” Many of the diversified farmers (vegetable, dairy, livestock, etc.) are selling directly to consumers over the course of a year with a large number of diverse transactions. This makes any hope of implementing a variable/flex rent approach much more complicated. So Iroquois Valley has farmers of non-grain crops make monthly payments throughout the year. These lease rates are set at a higher percentage rate than the grain rotation system. One common approach is to use a stair-step flat rate that might start at four percent of the acquisition price (plus carrying costs) and then later move to five percent and then to six percent. “I’d really like in the next one to three years for Iroquois Valley to make some strides to add more room for customization and financial sustainability in the system for working with diversified farmers,” says Carr.

On Farm Conservation Practices: Soil testing is done by a few farmers but is not required. Iroquois Valley focuses on practices that contribute to soil health rather than on focusing soil health test results. Iroquois Valley has considered moving towards portfolio-wide testing, but there are several issues. One is sourcing the funds for all of the testing required. Could a grant be secured for that? And what soil tests to use and could results be used in practical, actionable ways? In general, Iroquois Valley would need to develop a strategic way of approaching soil testing before it would launch into it across all of its holdings. 

Chemical Management: Investors in Iroquois Valley care about organic certification of the land, and that certification helps Iroquois Valley have a really strong metric in terms of environmental impact. While there have been some critiques of organic certification, Iroquois Valley values the clear and efficient certainty that organic certification offers – that chemicals haven’t been applied, that cover crops are being used, etc.

Claire Mesesan

Vice President, Farmer Relations

847-859-6645, ext. 702

[email protected]

 

Raya Carr

Senior Relationship Manager

847-859-6645, ext. 710

[email protected]

 

www.iroquoisvalleyfarms.com