Completed By:  Michelle Blackburn, Agriculture Specialist

Organization and its farmland

  • How much farmland does your organization own and manage? (total acres): 

3145 acres of row crop. Approx. 675 acres of grass hay.

  • Where is this farmland located? (Counties, State):

 Will County, IL

  • Will you be acquiring more farmland over time? (Y/N/Maybe): 

Yes

  • How much of your current farmland do you expect to still be in farmland in 10 years? (Please provide estimate by percentage or acreage, whichever is easier) 

I estimate 85% still in cropland in 10 years. Is dependent on funding for restoration or development.

  • What percentage or number of acres of your farm properties have farm infrastructure (fencing, well water, farm buildings – not including tiling)? Please share any helpful comments or explanations. 

None. Any structures on acquired property are removed.

  • In general, is your organization interested and willing to invest in more infrastructure (fences, wells, farm buildings, etc.) on the farmland it owns? (Y/N/Maybe – we welcome some comments as well if the situation is nuanced) 

No

  • What kind of farming is currently being done on your land? Please list the number of fields or acres for each.
      • Conventional commodity row crops (corn & soy): 2998 acres
      • Conventional livestock production: 
      • Organic/sustainable grains: 147 acres
      • Organic/sustainable/rotational livestock production: 
      • Local vegetable production: 
      • Hay: 675 acres
      • Trees/Agroforestry: 
      • Other: 
  • Does your organization offer (or partner to offer) any education about farming to the public or to the farmers who farm your organization’s land? (Y/N – if Yes, please briefly describe)

Yes, one program in October at Riverview Farmstead Preserve

  • How is revenue from your organization’s farmland used by your organization?

Used for conservation programs

Farmland management decision-making, staffing, and policies

  • Who leads the management and operation of your farmland on a day-to-day basis?

I do

  • How many staff total (full-time equivalents) manage your farmland on a day-to-day basis over a year? 

1

  • What policies, if any, drive or guide your land management decisions?  (If there is a specific policy, please share it with us when you respond to this survey.) 

We have an Agriculture Land Use Policy that supports conservation farming and regenerative agriculture goals.

  • Is fostering local food production on your farmland important to your organization? (Y/N – if Yes, please briefly explain how this is pursued or may be pursued in the future)

No

Relationship with Farmers and Conservation

  • What kind of standard leasing and licensing arrangements do you have with your farmers? How long do your leases typically last and do they ever deviate from that period? How are farmers selected for farmland lease opportunities? How is lease pricing set for standard farmland lease arrangements?  

Our farmland is offered to the public through a competitive bid process. Typically 3-year licenses are awarded, occasionally a 6-year is offered.

  • How many total lease or lease-to-own agreements does your organization have? 

21

  • When a farmer’s lease ends, can it be renewed without going into a competitive process? (Y/N – explanation appreciated if you answered Yes)

On conventional licenses, no. For Organic licenses the current tenant has right of first refusal.

  • Do you restrict any practices farmers can do on your land for conservation purposes (no fall tillage, prohibition on the use of certain chemicals, no hay cutting until certain date, etc.)?  (Y/N – if Yes, please briefly describe)

Yes, our program for conventional farming is no-till or strip till. Neonicotinoid treated soybean seeds are prohibited. Use of dicamba is prohibited. Post-harvest cutting of corn stubble is prohibited. Some hay areas cannot be cut until after August 15.

  • Do you require and/or incentivize any positive conservation measures to be taken by the farmers (use of cover crops, installation of prairie strips, etc)? (Y/N – if Yes, please briefly describe) 

We have 2 farm licenses (6-year term) that require cover crops. One farm license had the requirement to farm on contours and install prairie strips

  • Do you have any programs designed to help beginning farmers (farmers with less than 10 years of experience) get a start on your organization’s farmland? If so, please describe. 

No

  • Does your organization allow for unique/custom farming arrangements on specific farmland properties to explore or test conservation approaches? (Y/N – if Yes, please describe) 

No

  • Please describe any edge-of-field practices your organization carries out around tillable acreages or requires farmers to plant/maintain (e.g. buffers or bioreactors, etc.).  

Buffers and filter strips

  • Do you have any organic farming leases/arrangements with farmers? (Y/N – if Yes, please describe briefly and share how many acres are in organic production) 

Yes, one farm 147 acres on a six year license. First 3 years are transition, last 3 years are certified organic.

  • Do you do any formal or informal activities to build good relationships with your farmer tenants/partners, like meeting in person on an annual basis? (Y/N – if Yes, please describe briefly) 

Yes, tenant farmers are asked to visit the office to sign licenses and annually to pay their license fee and submit reporting forms.

Monitoring and Information systems

  • What systems does your organization use for holding and storing data about your farmland properties as well as for administering them (GIS, databases, etc.)?  

Access databases and ArcGIS Online.

  • What things do you monitor to determine whether your farmland management system has the conservation impacts you want to see?  

[Not Answered]

  • Soil testing? (Y/N – if yes, please provide a short description of what kind, how often, who pays for soil testing, whether same testing lab is used, etc.)

Yes, when licenses are going out for bid soil test for nutrients are done on those fields by same person and same lab is requested from years prior. Select fields have soil health tests done (Cornell). We pay for the soil testing.

  • Other soil health metrics (earthworms, etc.)? Y/N plus a short description. 

No

  • Erosion monitoring? Y/N with a short description if Yes 

Yes, some fields have terraces and basins installed and require monitoring.

  • Water quality testing/monitoring? Y/N plus short description if Yes  

No

  • Wildlife monitoring? Y/N plus short description if Yes  

Yes, I monitor bats with a passive detector in fields and use a trail camera to document wildlife.

  • Is the farmer responsible for providing any of the above information?

No

  • Do you have any indexes or other systems for quickly assessing the practices and ecological health of a particular piece of farmland?  

No

Bigger Picture Questions 

  • What are the three projects and/or aspects of your farmland management system you are most proud of in terms of your organization’s farmland management system over the past three years? 

Having a Board approved Ag Use Policy, having the no-till and strip-till requirement, installation and management of prairie strips

  • What are three of your institution’s biggest challenges around conservation-minded management of its farmland?

Not all tenants are of the same mindset when it comes to conservation farming, public/farmer criticism, Board commissioners not in support of agriculture

  • What changes are you considering making to your farmland management system over the next five years? 

Incorporating more field buffers, filter strips, and prairie strips for wildlife.

  •  

Interviewed: February, 2023

Michelle Blackburn, Agriculture Specialist

Management Policy and Structure: All departments within the Forest Preserve District of Will County (FPDWC) have policies for how things are to be done. The Natural Resources Department has, for example, policies on how it carries out habitat restoration. Policies have also been established for how farmland is managed. Initially, these policies were focused simply on licensing details. Later conservation was added as a goal and consideration. After working with Delta Institute, the FPDWC took the policies further by stating that regenerative agriculture principles would govern how farmland would be managed. As the policies were modified, the staff then began to modify the language of leases so they were in synch with the policies. The lease frameworks also provided a bit of wiggle room in case there was an opportunity to do something unique at a site that fit the FPDWC’s general principles. This led, too, to staff having the freedom to enter into multi-year leases rather than being limited only to the standard three-year lease. In addition, the policy spells out how organic farming leases would be treated. “It’s good to have all of this in writing,” says Michelle Blackburn. “If there are any questions, we can explain that the license language and Ag Land Use Policy has been approved by the Board of Commissioners.”

The board had little opposition to the changes to the agricultural policy. Blackburn believes this was because of a number of factors. First, staff had been talking about the needs and issues for years. Second, once other institutions started adopting regenerative farming practices (like the Illinois Department of Natural Resources beginning its cover crop program) and Delta Institute initiated the leasing toolkit for area institutions, FPDWC board and staff shared a desire to get on board with the larger movement. 

In the larger perspective, however, the FPDWC board sees agriculture as a stopgap interim land use until the parcels can be restored to habitat. 

Farmland management used to be included in the Planning Department along with real estate, landscape architects, and natural resources. Recently, they split the department so there is now a conservation department that  is responsible for natural resources and farmland management. This structural change has been beneficial for farmland management, as conservation is now a larger concern for how farmland management is done. 

Organic Farming: The FPDWC released the first organic grain farming Request for Proposal (RFP) by a farmland-owning institution in the state. In addition, the FPDWC found enthusiasm for further moving its farming in a more regenerative direction from the efforts and ideas of Delta Institute and the Liberty Prairie Foundation. Easing the effort was having the opportunity to look at the McHenry County Conservation District’s (MCCD) lease for its bison grazing operation at Pleasant Valley. “They did so well with their RFP,” says Blackburn, “and the framework was so easy to understand. I asked Brenna at MCCD if I could model our organic grain RFP in the same way. And it worked out great.”

The relationship with the Yunker family (the farmers that made the successful bid for the organic grain RFP at the 147-acre Jackson Creek farm parcel) has worked well. “They’re honest,” says Blackburn, “and are just great people and great resources about both organic and conventional farming.”

Early on, the Yunkers put in a 50-foot prairie buffer to separate their organic field from the conventionally farmed field next to it. They also began by cover cropping everything and are adding a small grain to one of the fields that is part of the larger property they are farming. At the end of the summer of 2022, Blackburn happened to be checking out the waterway in the vicinity of the fields the Yunkers are farming. “I noticed all of these monarchs,” says Blackburn, “Next thing I know one of the trees in the area is full of monarchs. I hope this is the beginning of observing an increase in insect population and biodiversity.” 

When the FPDWC put out an RFP for another property, however, there were no bidders. Later the Yunkers gave Blackburn feedback on the RFP and explained that it wasn’t the right kind of field layout for organic farming as it didn’t easily allow for in-row cultivation.

The FPDWC plans to transition other farmland to six-year organic leases in the future, but before they release any more RFPs, the FPDWC will evaluate potential fields and consider input from farmers about the location and layout of potential fields. FPDWC staff must also determine what the future restoration plans are for potential fields. There are several organic grain farmers in the county at the moment who might be interested in picking up more acres.

Edge of Field Practices and Prairie Strips: In two farming licenses, the FPDWC  required the installation of contour prairie strips for erosion control and 50-60’ buffers along a creek in some other fields. For both the prairie strips and the stream buffers, erosion management was the number one priority, and wildlife conservation was the second. “I found even the stream buffer strips,” says Blackburn, “attracted birds and butterflies constantly. That’s something you want to see.” 

Prairie strips can be burned by department staff or volunteers. Within the prairie strips, FPDWC staff have observed nests of ground-nesting birds as well as eastern kingbirds which nested on the edge of the field next to the prairie strips two years in a row. During a recent tour of the one prairie strip, FPDWC staff also heard the calls of orchard orioles for the first time. The tenant farmer has the responsibility of mowing the field borders regularly and the prairie strip once a year (no shorter than six inches).

Hay: FPDWC has approximately 1,000 acres in grass hay production to keep weed pressure in those grassland areas under control. Hay is, in the FPDWC’s perspective, a restoration tool as the FPDWC will seed a row crop field to native grasses and forbs, then sometimes cutting, or ‘haying’, is needed for weed suppression and to stimulate the growth of some species. Some areas are “early hay” and others are “late hay.” Late hay fields have their first and only cutting after August 1, to allow the nesting and fledging of grassland nesting birds that have been observed in the field For early hay fields, there is no restriction on timing and the farmer may be able to get two cuttings. It has been Blackburn’s experience that the grassland birds she sees are gone and fledged by mid-July/early August There are some species that can conceivably get two broods in.

Some hay farmers, however, don’t want the hay after August 1st as they claim the grasses have lost their nutritional value. 

The general challenge the FPDWC has with its hay management system is finding farmers willing to go out multiple times to mow, bale, and remove grass hay when there’s not much of a market for grass hay in the area of Will County where most of the FPDWC’s grasslands are. “And the challenge is also our roadways,” says Blackburn. “Some farmers say the roads are pretty dangerous (when hauling hay and mobilizing equipment).” But the FPDWC wants to persist in using grass hay as a restoration tool.

Farmer Relationships: It is the FPDWC’s practice to require farmers to come into the FPDWC office each year to sign any documents, submit any required records, and pay their rent for the next year. “It’s good to be face to face,” says Blackburn. “You can have a map out and talk about problem areas. I think they feel better, because they’re getting it all out there and letting you know what’s happening. You have to have a good working relationship. And then I can feel comfortable being honest as well, and they feel like their landowner cares.”

Staff Capacity: The FPDWC is hiring a permanent part time person for the natural resource management crew. This person will also help out with farm field inventories, checking compliance with the farm license agreements and hay permits.  

Local Food Production and Beginning Small-Scale Farmers: Blackburn has been meeting a number of beginning farmers in her county who want to grow local food (usually vegetables) on a small scale. These farmers are looking for smaller patches of land and are having a hard time doing so. Despite the challenges around infrastructure (water, etc.), Blackburn wants to further explore how the FPDWC could help farmers like these get a start and serve the county. The FPDWC has already signed one lease with a local food grower and is working closely with her.

Making Change: Blackburn’s experience has been that partnerships around knowledge sharing and resource sharing are essential. “It’s all about partners,” she says. She also shares that tenacity is critical for bringing about changes in larger institutions. The initial reaction to proposals for changes may not be favorable, but persistence can win people over. “Don’t take no for an answer,” she says.

Andrew J. Hawkins
Director of Conservation Programs
Forest Preserve District of Will County
815-722-9245
[email protected]

www.fpdwc.org